The unbillable hours audit
Track a week honestly and the pattern shows: hours on intake forms, engagement letters, status chasing, and document assembly. None of it needs a law degree, and most of it does not need a person.
Automations I build for firms
- Intake pipelines: inquiry, conflict-check prompt, engagement letter, signed and filed
- Document assembly from matter data: retainers, standard motions, letters
- Deadline and statute watchers with escalating alerts
- Client follow-up sequences that stay professional and never lapse
- Billing prep: time summaries assembled before invoicing day
Judgment stays with the lawyer
Automation drafts and routes; attorneys approve anything that leaves the building. That line is designed in from the start, and every workflow is documented so the firm is never dependent on a mystery box.
The offer, in one paragraph
I work as the AI systems builder on your team: $4,000 a month, published price, no contract. Your first working software lands inside 14 days of an approved plain-English plan, and month one is refundable if you are not happy. You own the code, the data, and the accounts from day one. The full offer, guarantees included, is at offer.busqueneil.com, and the pricing logic is unpacked in what custom software costs in 2026.
Common questions
What should a firm automate first?
Intake, almost always: it touches revenue, happens daily, and has clear rules. A firm typically sees the first automated intake flow live inside 14 days.
Is our client data safe in these workflows?
Workflows run in accounts the firm owns with minimal data movement, and nothing trains outside models. You can revoke my access at any time and everything keeps running.